Germany goal should have been ruled out for 'endangering opponent', say pundits

A goal that helped Germany progress in the World Cup should have been disallowed for a high boot that endangered an opponent, according to BBC Sport pundits. The controversy erupted in the Group E match at New York New Jersey Stadium when Alexander Pavlovic's elevated challenge in the build-up to Leroy Sane's strike went unpunished. Former England goalkeeper Joe Hart, ex-Lionesses striker Ellen White, and former Brazil and Liverpool midfielder Lucas Leiva all argued the incident met the criteria for a foul. "That's endangering the opponent," Hart said during BBC Sport's analysis, pointing to Pavlovic's boot being raised dangerously high as he contested the ball. White added the challenge was "dangerous" and should have been penalised before Sane scored. Leiva agreed, stating the officials missed a clear infringement. The goal stood, however, giving Germany a crucial advantage in the group stage. The decision has reignited debate about the interpretation of dangerous play in football, with the pundits unanimous that the standard of officiating fell short. Germany ultimately won the match, advancing to the knockout rounds, while Ecuador's players were left frustrated by the non-call. The incident was captured on video and shared on BBC Sport's platforms, sparking widespread discussion among fans. For Germany, the goal proved decisive; for the pundits, it was a clear case of the laws of the game being overlooked.